←back to thread

604 points wyldfire | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.228s | source
Show context
dleslie ◴[] No.26344736[source]
This captures my feelings on the issue:

> That framing is based on a false premise that we have to choose between “old tracking” and “new tracking.” It’s not either-or. Instead of re-inventing the tracking wheel, we should imagine a better world without the myriad problems of targeted ads.

I don't want to be tracked. I never have wanted to be tracked. I shouldn't have to aggressively opt-out of tracking; it should be a service one must opt-in to receive. And it's not something we can trust industry to correct properly. This is precisely the role that privacy-protecting legislation should be undertaking.

Stop spying on us, please.

replies(10): >>26345317 #>>26345398 #>>26345438 #>>26345507 #>>26345714 #>>26346976 #>>26347529 #>>26347549 #>>26349806 #>>26350238 #
an_opabinia ◴[] No.26345438[source]
> I don't want to be tracked. I never have wanted to be tracked.

Maybe just use Tor.

> Stop spying on us, please.

It was probably a mistake to equivocate the kind of data gathering that ad-tech companies do with the kind that oppressive governments do.

replies(5): >>26345532 #>>26346844 #>>26347051 #>>26347534 #>>26354944 #
1. dTal ◴[] No.26354944[source]
> Maybe just use Tor.

That's like diving into a conversation about CCTV proliferation with "just wear a ski mask". It's inconvenient, hinders daily activities, makes you look like a criminal, and might not even help. It's unreasonable.

>It was probably a mistake to equivocate the kind of data gathering that ad-tech companies do with the kind that oppressive governments do.

Given that oppressive governments can obtain the data from the ad-tech companies... no, not really.