←back to thread

1183 points robenkleene | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.262s | source
Show context
AlexandrB ◴[] No.24839296[source]
Both major consumer OS vendors seem hell-bent on bringing the OS layer under their complete control. As a power user, it's very frustrating. Meanwhile "desktop" Linux still kind of sucks, just like it did 10 years ago. I don't have much hope of seeing a compelling, unified UX out of Linux in my lifetime.
replies(6): >>24839339 #>>24839436 #>>24839550 #>>24839643 #>>24839695 #>>24839842 #
hexis ◴[] No.24839339[source]
Maybe desktop Linux needs more people like you and me to help make it better?
replies(2): >>24839530 #>>24839674 #
AlexandrB ◴[] No.24839530[source]
I appreciate the sentiment, but I'm not a UX designer or expert. And the problem is not that Linux doesn't have enough UI developers, it's that many of them are working on re-inventing the wheel in different, competing ways. Linux needs a dictatorial BDFL for UI - a Linus Torvalds for the desktop - an idea somewhat antithetical to the distributed nature of open source development.

It doesn't help that organizations that could be leading the charge keep changing direction. Ubuntu went Gnome -> Unity -> Gnome in the span of 15 years or so. And now they're going in hard on Snaps, which introduces breaks in UI uniformity again (Gnome Themes, for example[1]).

[1] https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2020/10/automatic-theme-installa...

replies(1): >>24839803 #
1. ebiester ◴[] No.24839803[source]
Two groups tried that. Unity tried that, and GNOME is trying that. Many of us really hate GNOME's decisions.

I'm not sure I really like the BDFL here.