←back to thread

DigitalOcean App Platform

(pages.news.digitalocean.com)
646 points digianarchist | 1 comments | 06 Oct 20 14:59 UTC | HN request time: 0.241s | source
Show context
bizzleDawg ◴[06 Oct 20 15:21 UTC] No.24698627[source]▶
I'd be interested to know if this is integrated and rebranded nanobox [0]? Or something completely from scratch?

[0]: https://nanobox.io/

replies(6): >>24698656 #>>24698770 #>>24699015 #>>24699941 #>>24700837 #>>24707772 #
phildougherty ◴[06 Oct 20 15:23 UTC] No.24698656[source]▶
We certainly took a lot of inspiration and leaned on the awesome experience of the nanobox team, but this is largely a completely different architecture.
replies(2): >>24699024 #>>24699475 #
Existenceblinks ◴[06 Oct 20 16:23 UTC] No.24699475[source]▶
Wasn't the Appsail nanobox? IIRC, it was planed to be DO's PaaS, so it's cancelled and then DO's PaaS is based on k8s instead?
replies(1): >>24699557 #
dubcanada ◴[06 Oct 20 16:28 UTC] No.24699557[source]▶
Appsail was nanobox from what I saw, they redid it between appsail and "apps".
replies(1): >>24699607 #
Existenceblinks ◴[06 Oct 20 16:32 UTC] No.24699607[source]▶
If Appsail was cancelled, what's the point of nanobox acquiring .. I wonder?
replies(1): >>24700418 #
1. dubcanada ◴[06 Oct 20 17:41 UTC] No.24700418[source]▶
Maybe an acquihire? I don't recall seeing any of the nanobox people even mentioned or reply in any of the slack messages. So I am not really sure.