(pages.news.digitalocean.com)

Show context

bizzleDawg ◴[06 Oct 20 15:21 UTC] No.24698627[source]▶

>>24698334 (OP) #

I'd be interested to know if this is integrated and rebranded nanobox [0]? Or something completely from scratch?

[0]: https://nanobox.io/

replies(6): >>24698656 #>>24698770 #>>24699015 #>>24699941 #>>24700837 #>>24707772 #

1. phildougherty ◴[06 Oct 20 15:23 UTC] No.24698656[source]▶

>>24698627 #

We certainly took a lot of inspiration and leaned on the awesome experience of the nanobox team, but this is largely a completely different architecture.

replies(2): >>24699024 #>>24699475 #

2. sciurus ◴[06 Oct 20 15:50 UTC] No.24699024[source]▶

>>24698656 (TP) #

Can you tell us anything about the architecture?

replies(2): >>24699163 #>>24701598 #

3. phildougherty ◴[06 Oct 20 16:01 UTC] No.24699163[source]▶

>>24699024 #

We will be revealing a lot more about the architecture at our upcoming virtual conference called Deploy that is happening Nov 10-11th. There are a few sessions that touch on how the platform was implemented and I encourage you to tune in for those! (schedule to be announced soon). https://www.digitalocean.com/deploy/

4. Existenceblinks ◴[06 Oct 20 16:23 UTC] No.24699475[source]▶

>>24698656 (TP) #

Wasn't the Appsail nanobox? IIRC, it was planed to be DO's PaaS, so it's cancelled and then DO's PaaS is based on k8s instead?

replies(1): >>24699557 #

5. dubcanada ◴[06 Oct 20 16:28 UTC] No.24699557[source]▶

>>24699475 #

Appsail was nanobox from what I saw, they redid it between appsail and "apps".

replies(1): >>24699607 #

6. Existenceblinks ◴[06 Oct 20 16:32 UTC] No.24699607{3}[source]▶

>>24699557 #

If Appsail was cancelled, what's the point of nanobox acquiring .. I wonder?

replies(1): >>24700418 #