←back to thread

1704 points ardit33 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
lordleft ◴[] No.24147974[source]
Imagine if Microsoft did this on PCs. a) prohibiting the installation of non-windows store software (sideloading) and b) insisting that all purchases done via apps give them a 30% cut. I think this is a ridiculous practice on the behalf of Apple.
replies(41): >>24148076 #>>24148127 #>>24148143 #>>24148262 #>>24148286 #>>24148287 #>>24148292 #>>24148330 #>>24148859 #>>24149045 #>>24149092 #>>24149163 #>>24149446 #>>24149497 #>>24149512 #>>24149528 #>>24149542 #>>24149625 #>>24149734 #>>24149806 #>>24149912 #>>24149964 #>>24150003 #>>24150060 #>>24150061 #>>24150176 #>>24150200 #>>24150336 #>>24150413 #>>24150430 #>>24150437 #>>24150439 #>>24150539 #>>24150604 #>>24150740 #>>24150801 #>>24151054 #>>24151476 #>>24151607 #>>24151940 #>>24152104 #
rvz ◴[] No.24148127[source]
Even worse. Imagine if the World Wide Web was not open and you had to go through a closed WWW like AOL and websites were "under review" by the providers and would take a 30% cut of your revenues or clicks on your web app or subscription service and websites require going only through that provider.

Thank goodness that wasn't the case.

replies(5): >>24148178 #>>24148415 #>>24150108 #>>24150629 #>>24152209 #
dpkonofa ◴[] No.24148415[source]
That's a little silly as an example because AOL was exactly like this back in the day and had curated channels. You could still access external sites if AOL was your ISP as well but anything inside of the AOL application was reviewed by AOL.

Also, the web is not even a great analogy period since it wasn't created by a private company. Apple created their phones, their App Store, they maintain it, and they provide the infrastructure for it. That's nothing like the internet.

replies(3): >>24148681 #>>24148964 #>>24152385 #
WWLink ◴[] No.24148964[source]
Yeah but this is as if you bought an AOL computer that did nothing but AOL. And AOL had absolute authority on what you could do on your computer.

I know, I know, people who bought iPhones knew what they were buying into.

replies(3): >>24149285 #>>24150541 #>>24150774 #
dwheeler ◴[] No.24149285[source]
Actually, I don't think most people who buy iPhones have any idea what they're buying into. They're buying a phone. In some cases, they're buying an iPhone to access things like FaceTime. if they want to communicate with their friends then they must buy an iPhone.
replies(2): >>24149648 #>>24149859 #
kqvamxurcagg ◴[] No.24149648[source]
Apple leverages user ignorance to create their demand-side app store monopoly. That's the entire point.
replies(1): >>24150551 #
scarface74 ◴[] No.24150551[source]
Right, because it couldn’t possibly be that most people don’t care about side loading apps?
replies(1): >>24150720 #
1. kqvamxurcagg ◴[] No.24150720[source]
My dude, my entire point is that most consumers don't care so it reinforces the monopoly.
replies(1): >>24150958 #
2. scarface74 ◴[] No.24150958[source]
So that kind of kills that whole “consumer harm” argument doesn’t it?
replies(1): >>24151264 #
3. tomxor ◴[] No.24151264[source]
Sure... ignorance never harmed anyone... right?
replies(1): >>24151515 #
4. scarface74 ◴[] No.24151515{3}[source]
If only the alternative operating system to the iPhone was owned by a company that had a popular website where they could educate consumers.....