←back to thread

Riot is now Element

(element.io)
550 points J_tt | 3 comments | 15 Jul 20 07:07 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
dividedbyzero ◴[15 Jul 20 07:49 UTC] No.23842409[source]▶
That's been long overdue and will hopefully help Matrix make inroads into more conservative organizations; I believe the tech is really promising. It's a definite liability, trying to introduce people to Matrix, when the de-facto default client's name evokes all kinds of unhelpful associations – it doesn't sound like work at all and it does sound like gamers, toys, apparently even like a far-left political organisation. Element should be fine for everyone.
replies(6): >>23842444 #>>23842526 #>>23842737 #>>23842798 #>>23842846 #>>23842929 #
starfallg ◴[15 Jul 20 09:08 UTC] No.23842846[source]▶
Does the name really inhibit adoption in a corporate environment that much, or is it just an excuse people put down in questionnaires?

Plenty of popular tools with questionable names. Splunk and slack comes to mind.

replies(3): >>23842887 #>>23842910 #>>23843042 #
1. szquadri ◴[15 Jul 20 09:42 UTC] No.23843042[source]▶
I can vouch that I avoided deploying it in corp environments due to the questionable name. "Element" is fine and is generic just like "Matrix". So name really does matter (specially in formal/corporate environments).
replies(1): >>23843209 #
2. shock ◴[15 Jul 20 10:08 UTC] No.23843209[source]▶
Your comment doesn't mean much if your company is on Slack. The "Slack" name can present issues for other people just like "Riot" has presented for you.
replies(1): >>23843733 #
3. lozf ◴[15 Jul 20 11:29 UTC] No.23843733[source]▶
Yes, even in 2016 I had non-techies think that an IM chat designed for the workplace called "Slack" was some sort of joke.