←back to thread

293 points doener | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
macspoofing ◴[] No.23831020[source]
The China-US tensions are not going to get better, and, in fact, will get worse as years go by. More and more nations will be forced to choose sides. It's not good and I'm not sure what a resolution even looks like.
replies(6): >>23831037 #>>23831065 #>>23831074 #>>23831083 #>>23831126 #>>23831142 #
est31 ◴[] No.23831126[source]
A resolution is difficult. China is a totalitarian country and totalitarianism needs to be fought, but I doubt that a democratic China would be any different when it comes to their claims to the world. They'd want to expand just as they want to expand now. Just look at the various western colonial empires of history. Many of them were democracies in some form or fashion.

Any long term resolution to the conflict has to involve the realization that China has had 100 bad years and now has a giant comeback. And that the US has had 60 good years but now large parts of it decline.

replies(3): >>23831239 #>>23832132 #>>23836632 #
magicsmoke ◴[] No.23831239[source]
Maybe the long term resolution involves recognizing that even if China is totalitarian, it's only within it's own borders. Unlike the cold war days, there's no race to convert countries to Communism or Democracy. China's main mode of interaction with other countries is through trade, it doesn't play the game of political/ideological proselytism. If democracy loses ground around the world, that's due more to it's own failings than a concerted push by China to replace it with totalitarianism. Spend more time and funds fixing the economic inequalities plaguing democratic society than wasting it on ineffective bogeymen like confronting China half a world away.
replies(1): >>23831690 #
1. jaekash ◴[] No.23831690[source]
> Maybe the long term resolution involves recognizing that even if China is totalitarian, it's only within it's own borders.

If it was not for china North Korea and possibly Pakistan would not have had nuclear weapons now. So no, it is not just in it's own borders.

replies(1): >>23836510 #
2. franklampard ◴[] No.23836510[source]
Source?