It’s insane how little respect the US has for the integrity of its political system. As long as it may hurt the “other” side everything is ok without regard to the damage they are constantly doing the health of the system.
It’s insane how little respect the US has for the integrity of its political system. As long as it may hurt the “other” side everything is ok without regard to the damage they are constantly doing the health of the system.
Is it really _censorship_ to fact check tweets? I mean, Twitter hasn't _removed_ (i.e. censored) any tweets from Trump, just added an annotation.
I have no idea why anyone would argue in favor of Twitter. When has it become required to be an expert in the field to be granted the privilege of leaving a comment on a forum? When has it become unacceptable to lie? People lie all the time. Advertisements lie to you, politicians lie to you, your mom lies to you.
It's really annoying that the truth police is going to go and check your tweets or comment—even if you ignore the fact that the line between facts and opinions isn't always easy to see. Even facts like Taiwan being its own country or part of China or the Armenian genocide can be denied, and people should be able to say that—and perhaps rightfully get shit for that, but still be able to say it.
We're going back to the Middle Ages, where if you say Earth isn't flat or God doesn't exist (replace with global warming isn't caused by humans, Covid-19 is man-made), you're executed.
Sad.
Because Twitter adds an annotion to a statement? An annotation that leads to facts/more information?
Why?
> When has it become unacceptable to lie?
If a world leader does that, it needs to be addressed. Would you accept all the information that comes out of other countries, for example North Korea?
Why should Twitter do that. They're a tech company and are in no position to add to anyone's statements—specially a world leader's.
> If a world leader does that, it needs to be addressed. Would you accept all the information that comes out of other countries, for example North Korea?
It already gets address at the next elections. Even if it doesn't, are you saying that Twitter is the right institution to address lying from world leaders?
Does the leader of North Korea post on Twitter? Why are you comparing the leader of the freest country with the most oppressive?
So many questions...