←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jjuel ◴[] No.23322521[source]
It is crazy to see how well he knows his base and how to get them to rally close to an election. Making them think everything is a liberal bias against them, and if they don't vote for his big government agenda they will receive a big government agenda. This is just one more way for him to get his base to believe everything he says versus people who actually prove what he says is a lie. He wants state run media and social media just like China. As much as he talks about hating China he would love to be China.
replies(4): >>23322583 #>>23322900 #>>23325723 #>>23328099 #
sp332 ◴[] No.23322583[source]
And this is specifically on a tweet calling the validity of the election into question. It's blatantly wrong, but he needs his base to believe him when he says the election is rigged.
replies(3): >>23322707 #>>23322843 #>>23322887 #
frockington1 ◴[] No.23322887[source]
Hasn't the other side been #NotMyPresient and throwing a tantrum about the validity of the last election? Trump is not a trailblazer in this regard
replies(5): >>23323058 #>>23323063 #>>23323079 #>>23323335 #>>23329443 #
1. alistairSH ◴[] No.23323335[source]
There's a massive difference between...

1. Questioning whether the Electoral College (and its tendency to devalue votes in some states) has a place in the modern US.

2. Questioning whether the election itself is completely rigged (via fraudulent votes).

#1 is the question many liberals have been asking. #2 is thee claim that the entire GOP has been making for years, despite their own investigations never turning up more than a few individuals voting fraudulently (but never systematic fraud perpetrated by the political left, as they claim).