←back to thread

707 points patd | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jjuel ◴[] No.23322521[source]
It is crazy to see how well he knows his base and how to get them to rally close to an election. Making them think everything is a liberal bias against them, and if they don't vote for his big government agenda they will receive a big government agenda. This is just one more way for him to get his base to believe everything he says versus people who actually prove what he says is a lie. He wants state run media and social media just like China. As much as he talks about hating China he would love to be China.
replies(4): >>23322583 #>>23322900 #>>23325723 #>>23328099 #
sp332 ◴[] No.23322583[source]
And this is specifically on a tweet calling the validity of the election into question. It's blatantly wrong, but he needs his base to believe him when he says the election is rigged.
replies(3): >>23322707 #>>23322843 #>>23322887 #
frockington1 ◴[] No.23322887[source]
Hasn't the other side been #NotMyPresient and throwing a tantrum about the validity of the last election? Trump is not a trailblazer in this regard
replies(5): >>23323058 #>>23323063 #>>23323079 #>>23323335 #>>23329443 #
1. shadowgovt ◴[] No.23323058[source]
(a) imagining there's one "other side" is a fallacy. There are multiple interest groups. Some more aligned with the President and his administration, some less.

(b) you'll have to be more specific about what you mean, but the "tantrum" I've heard is that the system as set up over-represents land over people, not that the result is illegitimate. A legitimate result in a badly-crafted system is materially different from claiming the process as designed is compromised.