←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.438s | source
Show context
lord_erasmus ◴[] No.23219890[source]
In most of these stories featuring Google abusing their power to remove apps, it's usually a matter of some automated tool gone wrong and the problem is solved a couple of days later. But this time it's different, they are actually asking developers to censor themselves if they are not affiliated with a gov.
replies(5): >>23220004 #>>23220611 #>>23220957 #>>23220962 #>>23221130 #
gundmc ◴[] No.23220004[source]
What makes you think this is something other than another (awful) high profile case of automation gone wrong?
replies(3): >>23220108 #>>23220199 #>>23221080 #
gitgud ◴[] No.23221080[source]
Surely Google's automated tools wouldn't automatically suspend an app that has 5 stars and over 500,000 reviews

.... surely

replies(2): >>23221210 #>>23223654 #
1. Spivak ◴[] No.23223654[source]
That kind "popularity content" policy will never work because because then scammers will just buy apps with good reputation. This describes the entire browser extension marketplace. Any extension with a good reputation and a broad permission set will sell for a good bit of money.
replies(1): >>23240115 #
2. saagarjha ◴[] No.23240115[source]
That sounds like a spot where a human can step in?