←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.209s | source
Show context
dreamcompiler ◴[] No.23220377[source]
Pretty ironic given that an "official government source" advocated the ineffective and dangerous drug hydroxychloroquine and suggested people inject bleach into their bodies.

Edit: Changed hydroxyquinone to the correct hydroxychloroquine.

replies(1): >>23220426 #
lbeltrame ◴[] No.23220426[source]
Where is the proof of inefficacy? For the record, there's no proof of efficacy either, because all the trials done that prove or disprove efficacy of hydroxychloroquine were flawed in one point or the other (at least the ones I've read).

To give an answer to this endless debate, a proper, randomized clinical trial is needed. And the conditions set correctly, too: lopinavir and ritonavir were, per NEJM, not successful, but a later study in Lancet showed that administration at earlier time points (within 7 days of symptom onset) might be working and needs more investigation.

I know Novartis is running a trial, and so is U of Minnesota[1] which has finally completed enrollment and will release results after peer review.

Oh, and more on topic, it looks like Twitter has blocked a legitimate page of the Canadian part of the same group of trials[2].

[1] https://covidpep.umn.edu/

[2] https://twitter.com/DrToddLee/status/1261442201369939968

replies(4): >>23220536 #>>23220726 #>>23222401 #>>23227151 #
1. rsynnott ◴[] No.23222401[source]
> Where is the proof of inefficacy?

This is a really odd idea. Drugs are normally assumed ineffective until proven otherwise.