←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
lord_erasmus ◴[] No.23219890[source]
In most of these stories featuring Google abusing their power to remove apps, it's usually a matter of some automated tool gone wrong and the problem is solved a couple of days later. But this time it's different, they are actually asking developers to censor themselves if they are not affiliated with a gov.
replies(5): >>23220004 #>>23220611 #>>23220957 #>>23220962 #>>23221130 #
swiley ◴[] No.23220957[source]
Meh. If I left an automation roaming the streets and it ate someone’s kid I would get in trouble.

If google’s automations are broken and they harm the world then they need to be responsible and fix them or replace them with people.

replies(2): >>23222115 #>>23222761 #
1. buttersbrian ◴[] No.23222115[source]
But automating something that might eat a kid, versus inadvertently blocking an app access very very different. This why no one is tackling a nanny bot --- repercussions.

Agreed on the last part.

replies(1): >>23226998 #
2. swiley ◴[] No.23226998[source]
Ok maybe an automation that blocked a parking lot is a better analogy.