←back to thread

1525 points garyclarke27 | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
lord_erasmus ◴[] No.23219890[source]
In most of these stories featuring Google abusing their power to remove apps, it's usually a matter of some automated tool gone wrong and the problem is solved a couple of days later. But this time it's different, they are actually asking developers to censor themselves if they are not affiliated with a gov.
replies(5): >>23220004 #>>23220611 #>>23220957 #>>23220962 #>>23221130 #
gundmc ◴[] No.23220004[source]
What makes you think this is something other than another (awful) high profile case of automation gone wrong?
replies(3): >>23220108 #>>23220199 #>>23221080 #
gitgud ◴[] No.23221080[source]
Surely Google's automated tools wouldn't automatically suspend an app that has 5 stars and over 500,000 reviews

.... surely

replies(2): >>23221210 #>>23223654 #
1. sp332 ◴[] No.23221210[source]
There have been too many cases of a popular app being bought by scammers and repurposed. They can't exempt an app from being suspended just because it's popular.
replies(1): >>23221365 #
2. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.23221365[source]
Exempting it from automatic suspension is not exempting it from suspension.
replies(1): >>23227872 #
3. Technetium ◴[] No.23227872[source]
I would rather apps be automatically suspended and the install marked as potentially dangerous than have my device goatse'd to a malicious developer for any amount of time.
replies(1): >>23228759 #
4. Dylan16807 ◴[] No.23228759{3}[source]
That can be accommodated. Automatic suspension that lasts 20-30 minutes while someone on the team looks into the case and makes a human judgement.

But a full suspension, on a popular app, without rapid human review? That shouldn't happen.

Also, this wasn't up to the "install marked as dangerous" level. They just prevented new installs. In a situation like that, there's no need to act instantly.