←back to thread

1597 points seapunk | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.415s | source
Show context
Tokkemon ◴[] No.22703216[source]
Is Zoom the best though? Google Hangouts seems to be just as good.
replies(10): >>22703260 #>>22703263 #>>22703267 #>>22703285 #>>22703293 #>>22703294 #>>22703344 #>>22703764 #>>22704889 #>>22707034 #
buro9 ◴[] No.22703294[source]
Try it at 12 people.

Try it when you want to control who is speaking and when.

Try it when you want to co-ordinate hundreds of participants and still want to track who has a question so you can hand the virtual mic / airtime to them.

Try it when you want breakout groups and to determine who is in which group, and after a set time for the groups to return to the main space.

What is good enough for 2 people facing each other, and appears to work perfectly well for a group of 5 or 6... doesn't quite scale to a company all-hands, or giving a lecture or seminar.

Tools fit a scale, and Zoom is excessive for the small and simple use-case but excels at the large and complex.

replies(4): >>22703441 #>>22703468 #>>22703609 #>>22704003 #
1. OrangeMango ◴[] No.22703609[source]
I appreciate listing the areas in which Zoom beats competitors. It helps people understand where work should be done on alternatives.

My company has been remote-only for about 1.5 weeks now and we have 4 different conferencing systems that people are using. It's interesting that everyone has their preferences, but for small meetings nobody is using Zoom as far as I've seen.

replies(1): >>22704047 #
2. floatingatoll ◴[] No.22704047[source]
Be aware that allowing everybody to continue following their preferences will result in the same proliferation that you see with text editors, email clients, and programming languages. Based on having only 4 different systems, I might predict that your company size is ~100-200 people (though that's a napkin estimate based on a single integer). There are at least 10 systems available, and certainly many more that are only accessible to technical people.