←back to thread

408 points seapunk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.236s | source
Show context
roenxi ◴[] No.21202536[source]
It is interesting to look back at the last ~50 years from a strategic standpoint. The West gambled that economic prosperity would usher in an age of Chinese liberty, if not actual democracy, and that attempts to resist that would lead to economic collapse.

With benefit of hindsight maybe that strategy was too passive. China has embraced the technical aspects of Western society but it looks dangerously like it will carry them with an authoritarian philosophy. It is a pity; particularly since the English Common Law system combined with separation of power is the greatest accomplishment of the Anglosphere and China would have really ushered in an age of enlightenment had they taken that on.

replies(6): >>21202777 #>>21202822 #>>21202880 #>>21203076 #>>21203094 #>>21203621 #
cafard ◴[] No.21202880[source]
Did the West make that bet? Or did the businesses of the West see a big market and ultimately a big, inexpensive supply chain?
replies(4): >>21202908 #>>21202927 #>>21203086 #>>21203767 #
1. AFascistWorld ◴[] No.21203767[source]
> Clinton began his term believing that trade sanctions could pressure China to improve human rights conditions. But after a year of debilitating debate, he was forced to reverse his policy of link- ing trade to human rights. >He was right to do so. By continuing to grant MFN to China, Clinton will help advance the $38 billion trading relationship which the U.S. now enjoys with the world's fastest growing economy. Moreover, by increasing prosperity in China through greater trade, the U.S. can help to create the economic freedoms that are the foundation upon which political freedom will someday emerge.

-

>Clinton began to end this spectacle of confusion last week when he decided to renew MFN almost with- out condition. Perhaps the most important aspect of his decision is philosophical; the President has now adopted the view that trade relations must be separated from U.S. political goals with China. Moreover, he has endorsed the view that increased U.S.-China trade can promote economic freedoms, which in the long run will spur the growth of political freedoms in China.

-

>This step alone will help to reassure Asian friends and adversaries that Clinton plans to get a better grip on foreign policy.

-

>Now that Clinton has reversed his policy, he should move quickly to exact a price-of Beijing's cooperation in two areas of critical concern to the U.S. They are:

* Ending North Korea's nuclear threat...

* Better treatment for Hong Kong and Taiwan...

-

https://www.heritage.org/report/the-collapse-clintons-china-... June 3, 1994