←back to thread

408 points seapunk | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
roenxi ◴[] No.21202536[source]
It is interesting to look back at the last ~50 years from a strategic standpoint. The West gambled that economic prosperity would usher in an age of Chinese liberty, if not actual democracy, and that attempts to resist that would lead to economic collapse.

With benefit of hindsight maybe that strategy was too passive. China has embraced the technical aspects of Western society but it looks dangerously like it will carry them with an authoritarian philosophy. It is a pity; particularly since the English Common Law system combined with separation of power is the greatest accomplishment of the Anglosphere and China would have really ushered in an age of enlightenment had they taken that on.

replies(6): >>21202777 #>>21202822 #>>21202880 #>>21203076 #>>21203094 #>>21203621 #
cafard ◴[] No.21202880[source]
Did the West make that bet? Or did the businesses of the West see a big market and ultimately a big, inexpensive supply chain?
replies(4): >>21202908 #>>21202927 #>>21203086 #>>21203767 #
1. TeMPOraL ◴[] No.21202908[source]
I'd say the latter, and "the bet" was used as an after the fact excuse.