←back to thread

1456 points pulisse | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.425s | source
Show context
peterkelly ◴[] No.21183239[source]
This reminds me of the story about how the first release of Windows 95 was banned in India because 8 pixels of the map shown in the timezone selection control panel were colored in such a way that suggested parts of Kashmir were part of Pakistan.

https://www.cnet.com/news/how-eight-pixels-cost-microsoft-mi...

https://devblogs.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20030822-00/?p=42...

replies(6): >>21183342 #>>21183820 #>>21183966 #>>21186158 #>>21186703 #>>21187557 #
dirtyid ◴[] No.21183966[source]
Related to the original discussion, I wonder if there's a story behind how Taiwan got a emoji flag in the first place. Unicode Consortium referenced ISO 3166 for eligibility. Taiwan and a few other disputed regions didn't the cut until 3166-2 revision. The maintenance agency consists of representative from only western agencies. Interesting politics.
replies(3): >>21184165 #>>21186484 #>>21187282 #
erk__ ◴[] No.21184165[source]
I beleive that the unicode consortium have chosen not to say much about witch flags are there pretty much for this reason. They don't want unicode to get mixed in with international politics.
replies(2): >>21184252 #>>21184355 #
adt2bt ◴[] No.21184252[source]
There is no truly neutral position though. Who gets the final say then?
replies(2): >>21184390 #>>21186210 #
1. loeg ◴[] No.21184390[source]
Have you seen unicode? They usually err on the side of including everything, including, e.g., alphabets of fictional languages.
replies(1): >>21184468 #
2. organsnyder ◴[] No.21184468[source]
Those fictional languages' mere existence isn't perceived as a threat by any government, though.