←back to thread

1798 points jerryX | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
jules ◴[] No.18567950[source]
If your country has "democratic" in the name it's probably not democratic. If your major has "science" in the name it's probably not science. If your company has "don't be evil" in its motto...
replies(8): >>18568335 #>>18568339 #>>18568817 #>>18568897 #>>18569030 #>>18569322 #>>18570530 #>>18571534 #
_Schizotypy ◴[] No.18569030[source]
So what is neuroscience then
replies(2): >>18569143 #>>18569217 #
PurpleBoxDragon ◴[] No.18569217[source]
That's why it should just be under neurology.
replies(2): >>18569772 #>>18569885 #
rusk ◴[] No.18569772[source]
isn't neurology more to do with the physiological aspect? Neuroscience is a bit more like behavioural psychology.
replies(2): >>18569799 #>>18602169 #
jessaustin ◴[] No.18569799{3}[source]
Is that really an argument in favor of it being a science? Isn't behavioral psych going through a "replication crisis"?
replies(2): >>18571193 #>>18602185 #
1. rusk ◴[] No.18571193{4}[source]
No. It’s saying that GP has completely miscategorised notwithstanding your clumsy strawman.
replies(1): >>18584812 #
2. jessaustin ◴[] No.18584812[source]
What "strawman"? You introduced behavioral psych to the discussion. You seem more certain now, however...