←back to thread

2024 points randlet | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.205s | source
Show context
bla2 ◴[] No.17515883[source]
> I don't ever want to have to fight so hard for a PEP and find that so many people despise my decisions.

Leading a large open source project must be terrible in this age of constant outrage :-(

replies(9): >>17515955 #>>17515972 #>>17516193 #>>17516427 #>>17516776 #>>17516884 #>>17517282 #>>17517716 #>>17517821 #
sjm-lbm ◴[] No.17515955[source]
It's PHP and not Python, but every time I read something like this from a major open source figure, I always think of this old PHP mailing list thread:

https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=50696

replies(8): >>17516108 #>>17516130 #>>17516216 #>>17516240 #>>17516461 #>>17516708 #>>17516836 #>>17517666 #
raverbashing ◴[] No.17516216[source]
"This is going to cause us MONTHS or fixing code for no real benefit since this behavior change is arbitrary and seemingly, was made for no reason"

Yeah, tough. Fix your code

That's the attitude some maintainers need in cutting unreasonable requests.

replies(1): >>17516395 #
ashelmire ◴[] No.17516395[source]
It's hilarious because it's literally a one-liner that Rasmus provided for him.
replies(1): >>17516460 #
sjm-lbm ◴[] No.17516460[source]
It's more hilarious because his response to that (basically, "this is tax software so there will be a lot of QA when we make that change") is at least sort of legitimate, but only because his accounting software evidently only works due to undefined corner cases in the underlying platform, and that's just ... wow.
replies(3): >>17516692 #>>17517084 #>>17517300 #
1. ocschwar ◴[] No.17517084[source]
The underlying platform? WOuld that be Python or the tax law?