←back to thread

2024 points randlet | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.292s | source
Show context
bla2 ◴[] No.17515883[source]
> I don't ever want to have to fight so hard for a PEP and find that so many people despise my decisions.

Leading a large open source project must be terrible in this age of constant outrage :-(

replies(9): >>17515955 #>>17515972 #>>17516193 #>>17516427 #>>17516776 #>>17516884 #>>17517282 #>>17517716 #>>17517821 #
symmitchry ◴[] No.17515972[source]
I'm a little confused though, by his feelings here. Why did he feel the need to "fight so hard for a PEP" if it was so controversial, and everyone was outraged?

I do understand people's points about "the age of outrage" and "internet 2018" but still: the PEP wasn't generally accepted as being a fantastic improvement, so why did he feel the need to fight so hard for it?

replies(5): >>17516128 #>>17516129 #>>17516223 #>>17516774 #>>17519017 #
sametmax ◴[] No.17516223[source]
That's the very point of a bdfl : it assumes he knows better than others. Debating is for insight and cortesy, not mandatory.
replies(2): >>17516307 #>>17518113 #
21 ◴[] No.17516307[source]
But the B is for Benevolent. When a huge part of the community is against, does that B still stands?
replies(6): >>17516435 #>>17516440 #>>17516441 #>>17516601 #>>17516714 #>>17516986 #
1. iajrz ◴[] No.17516986[source]
B stands for benevolent even in that case. The target of that benevolence is the project. His call should be in the best interest of the project (benevolent), final (dictator), and (tongue in cheek) eternal (for life)