←back to thread

370 points sillypuddy | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.685s | source
Show context
jstewartmobile ◴[] No.16406941[source]
I hate to have sympathy for the devil here, but I see their point.

Hackernews is living proof. Pre-election, you could voice a contrary opinion here and have a discussion. Post-election, even the faintest wrongthink shibboleth gets silently downvoted into oblivion.

replies(5): >>16407017 #>>16407529 #>>16407769 #>>16407835 #>>16409758 #
chappi42 ◴[] No.16407529[source]
It's the same in Germany. You voice that the many refugees (with often very conservative religious and patriarchal views) pose problems and, päng, you are a nazi.

A balanced discourse is (was) no longer possible. (It's getting a bit better again after some ramnifications became plain to see in some every-day situations).

replies(3): >>16407608 #>>16407609 #>>16407905 #
1. didibus ◴[] No.16407608[source]
Aren't there prerequisite to a discourse? Like all parties coming together with open minds. Having the intent to seek the truth, not an agenda to win. Using reason and rational thinking over your emotions.

I think lately we're not meeting those qualifications, so maybe it is best not to engage, since discourse would not be productive.

replies(1): >>16407639 #
2. muninn_ ◴[] No.16407639[source]
Which could be a fine solution, except one or more groups still are making rules which affect the lives of all of the other groups. So disengaging means letting other groups you may disagree with dictate parts of your life.
replies(1): >>16409019 #
3. XorNot ◴[] No.16409019[source]
Welcome to civil society. Learn to play ball and compromise since the alternative is from what those refugees are escaping.