←back to thread

CDC gets list of forbidden words

(www.washingtonpost.com)
382 points js2 | 1 comments | 16 Dec 17 02:17 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
jimjimjim ◴[16 Dec 17 03:29 UTC] No.15937289[source]▶
How can anybody actually support the current administration if this sort of thing is what is being pushed. how is this improving the world? how is this better? how is this good?

anyone?

replies(3): >>15937336 #>>15937379 #>>15937472 #
maneesh[dead post] ◴[16 Dec 17 03:35 UTC] No.15937336[source]▶
"How can anybody actually support Silicon Valley if this sort of thing is what is being pushed. how is this improving the world? how is this better? how is this good?"

https://imgur.com/a/vGbLm

jimjimjim ◴[16 Dec 17 03:40 UTC] No.15937370[source]▶
interesting article. right. back to the original question...
replies(1): >>15937455 #
snowpanda ◴[16 Dec 17 03:53 UTC] No.15937455{3}[source]▶
Your question was being answered. You asked how, OP showed you how by showing you that you're likely doing it yourself. Unless you've never used a product from SF.
replies(1): >>15937583 #
1. scrollaway ◴[16 Dec 17 04:10 UTC] No.15937583{4}[source]▶
I'm not aware of San Francisco censoring the CDC. And should you point me to such a thing happening, I would certainly be against it.

If maneesh's or your point is that you somehow cannot be against this without also being hypocritical, please check your assumptions. "You're likely doing it yourself" is complete bs.