←back to thread

CDC gets list of forbidden words

(www.washingtonpost.com)
382 points js2 | 6 comments | | HN request time: 1.006s | source | bottom
Show context
jimjimjim ◴[] No.15937289[source]
How can anybody actually support the current administration if this sort of thing is what is being pushed. how is this improving the world? how is this better? how is this good?

anyone?

replies(3): >>15937336 #>>15937379 #>>15937472 #
1. jimjimjim ◴[] No.15937370[source]
interesting article. right. back to the original question...
replies(1): >>15937455 #
2. snowpanda ◴[] No.15937455[source]
Your question was being answered. You asked how, OP showed you how by showing you that you're likely doing it yourself. Unless you've never used a product from SF.
replies(1): >>15937583 #
3. wnevets ◴[] No.15937481[source]
are you really comparing a title of a post on hacker news to official policy of the united states of america?
replies(1): >>15938206 #
4. cscurmudgeon ◴[] No.15937574[source]
Not all words are same.

Some words are good.

Some words are bad.

5. scrollaway ◴[] No.15937583{3}[source]
I'm not aware of San Francisco censoring the CDC. And should you point me to such a thing happening, I would certainly be against it.

If maneesh's or your point is that you somehow cannot be against this without also being hypocritical, please check your assumptions. "You're likely doing it yourself" is complete bs.

6. smsm42 ◴[] No.15938206[source]
It's not only the title of a post. There are lots of things you can't say in academic environment (as dozens of people proved), in work environment (as Damore example proved), in conference environment (as Tim Hunt example proved) and in many other places. We see people persecuted for speech all around, sometimes successfully, sometimes not, but it's not like it's some foreign idea that some evil Trumper just invented.

Yes, of course, it's not a government agency policy. It is a university policy, corporate policy, industry policy, media policy, and so on, and so forth. But it's in no way unprecedented to have those, and I'm not sure what's the big difference here - the policy in question applies to the workers of the agency, just as university policy would apply to the workers of the university.

Obama administration chose not to use words like "radical Islam", "war on terror", "jihadi" and others that were not aligned with their political goals. He also banned words like "Eskimo" and "Aleut" from appearing in federal laws[1], since they are not considered acceptable anymore. Trump administration, of course, has its own policies, but the practice of telling government workers which words they can and can't use is certainly not new.

[1] https://www.adn.com/alaska-news/2016/05/23/obama-signs-measu...