←back to thread

757 points shak77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
blauditore ◴[] No.15932880[source]
Many people seem to be shocked because Mozilla installed an add-on automatically. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla - they're building the whole browser, so they could introduce functionality anywhere. If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all?

The main question is what behavior is being introduced. I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the add-on does nothing until the user opts-in on studies.

replies(16): >>15932942 #>>15932953 #>>15932998 #>>15932999 #>>15933001 #>>15933342 #>>15933599 #>>15933649 #>>15933656 #>>15933806 #>>15933901 #>>15934475 #>>15934693 #>>15935133 #>>15935703 #>>15941934 #
vorpalhex ◴[] No.15933001[source]
This is being added to the browser, outside the realm of security updates, through what is supposed to be a UX improvement program, for commercial purposes. It's written by a commercial company that produces advertisement content. It's not clear this code is audited.

Sorry, but I'm uninstalling firefox. They have broken the basic trust I have in them as a user to not push arbitrary code to my machine against my interests.

replies(3): >>15933127 #>>15933285 #>>15933317 #
benbenolson ◴[] No.15933127[source]
What browser are you going to use instead?
replies(3): >>15933561 #>>15933969 #>>15934021 #
hjek ◴[] No.15933969[source]
Links2. http://links.twibright.com

No, it doesn't show PDFs or videos, but does that belong in the browser anyway?

replies(1): >>15934543 #
thanatropism ◴[] No.15934543{3}[source]
I wonder if Links2 or lynx can be ported as Chrome add-ons.
replies(1): >>15936460 #