Most active commenters
  • rnhmjoj(3)

←back to thread

Unknown Mozilla dev addon "Looking Glass 1.0.3" on browser

(support.mozilla.org)
757 points shak77 | 11 comments | 15 Dec 17 13:47 UTC | HN request time: 0.669s | source | bottom
Show context
blauditore ◴[15 Dec 17 16:23 UTC] No.15932880[source]▶
Many people seem to be shocked because Mozilla installed an add-on automatically. In my opinion, it doesn't really matter since the code is coming from Mozilla - they're building the whole browser, so they could introduce functionality anywhere. If someone distrusts their add-ons, why trust their browser at all?

The main question is what behavior is being introduced. I haven't researched deeply, but apparently the add-on does nothing until the user opts-in on studies.

replies(16): >>15932942 #>>15932953 #>>15932998 #>>15932999 #>>15933001 #>>15933342 #>>15933599 #>>15933649 #>>15933656 #>>15933806 #>>15933901 #>>15934475 #>>15934693 #>>15935133 #>>15935703 #>>15941934 #
vorpalhex ◴[15 Dec 17 16:37 UTC] No.15933001[source]▶
This is being added to the browser, outside the realm of security updates, through what is supposed to be a UX improvement program, for commercial purposes. It's written by a commercial company that produces advertisement content. It's not clear this code is audited.

Sorry, but I'm uninstalling firefox. They have broken the basic trust I have in them as a user to not push arbitrary code to my machine against my interests.

replies(3): >>15933127 #>>15933285 #>>15933317 #
1. benbenolson ◴[15 Dec 17 16:55 UTC] No.15933127[source]▶
What browser are you going to use instead?
replies(3): >>15933561 #>>15933969 #>>15934021 #
2. rnhmjoj ◴[15 Dec 17 17:48 UTC] No.15933561[source]▶
If you like Firefox but don't trust Mozilla anymore there are plenty of forks to choose from: Waterfox, Pale Moon, Basilisk, GNU IceCat.

Personally I build Firefox from source and maintain a set of patches largely based on these: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/firefox-esr-privacy/

replies(1): >>15934256 #
3. hjek ◴[15 Dec 17 18:39 UTC] No.15933969[source]▶
Links2. http://links.twibright.com

No, it doesn't show PDFs or videos, but does that belong in the browser anyway?

replies(1): >>15934543 #
4. pweissbrod ◴[15 Dec 17 18:45 UTC] No.15934021[source]▶
Firefox 57's sweeping changes ruined most of my vim-like ui customizations (vimperator, vimfx). For 2 months I've switched to qutebrowser and palemoon as a backup and dont miss firefox at all.

If you're looking for a browser with first-class vim compatibility qutebrowser is outstanding.

I've also found palemoon to be a perfectly boring/stable/functional variant of firefox without all the drastic/breaking changes (vim plugins work quite well also)

replies(1): >>15936098 #
5. Grollicus ◴[15 Dec 17 19:16 UTC] No.15934256[source]▶
I think about doing this as well but heard a lot of bad things about the firefox build process. How long does it take to build for you?
replies(1): >>15934431 #
6. rnhmjoj ◴[15 Dec 17 19:43 UTC] No.15934431{3}[source]▶
They are probably true. Using an i5 @4.3GHz it takes 2.5/3 hours to build. To test changes you must set up a compiler cache or it's going to take forever.
replies(1): >>15935605 #
7. thanatropism ◴[15 Dec 17 19:56 UTC] No.15934543[source]▶
I wonder if Links2 or lynx can be ported as Chrome add-ons.
replies(1): >>15936460 #
8. notanote ◴[15 Dec 17 22:02 UTC] No.15935605{4}[source]▶
That seems a little slow. I compile nightly for my own use and it takes around 20 minutes on a haswell i5, using tmpfs for the build directory.
replies(1): >>15936336 #
9. bigbugbag ◴[15 Dec 17 23:15 UTC] No.15936098[source]▶
If you were a vimperator aficionado you might want to have a look at uzbl.

Pale moon is not as good as waterfox, at least for me.

10. rnhmjoj ◴[15 Dec 17 23:53 UTC] No.15936336{5}[source]▶
20 minutes sound like a dream, I don't know why it's so slow for me. Maybe because I'm using Nix to build it and the source is on an SSD. I can't use tmpfs because it doesn't fit in memory without adding swap.
11. hjek ◴[16 Dec 17 00:16 UTC] No.15936460{3}[source]▶
Yup, https://chrome.google.com/extensions/detail/bjekedpipaedojkb...