←back to thread

757 points shak77 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.207s | source
Show context
exikyut ◴[] No.15932108[source]
HOLD THE PHONE

The support thread links to https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/lookingglass.

That page says, in a clearly delineated box,

> No changes will be made to Firefox unless you have opted in to this Alternate Reality Game.

PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS INCONSISTENCY.

replies(2): >>15932156 #>>15932788 #
LyndsySimon ◴[] No.15932156[source]
Hopefully, it's a bug, and that addon wasn't intended to be installed (much less active) universally like it is.

That doesn't make it OK, but it would make me look at them with suspicion instead of hostility.

replies(1): >>15932359 #
gr3yh47[dead post] ◴[] No.15932359[source]
>Hopefully, it's a bug, and that addon wasn't intended to be installed (much less active) universally like it is.

hey look, a voice of reason!

seriously. Mozilla is a company that has a long track record of dedication to openness and the free and open internet

this isnt Google, facebook, etc

let's all take a step back and give them a little benefit of the doubt here, until we get some facts on what happened.

for everyone else...

WANT TO JOIN THE MOB? I'VE GOT YOU COVERED! COME ON DOWN TO GR3YH47'S PITCHFORK EMPORIUM!

I GOT 'EM ALL! SETTING UP SHOP IN HACKERNEWS MEANS BIG SALES!

CHEAP TRADITIONAL FORKS! ON SALE!

Traditional ---E

Left Handed 3---

Fancy ---{

DEFECTIVE CLEARANCE ARE EVEN LOWER!

---F

---L

---e

NEW IN STOCK. DIRECTLY FROM LICHTENSTEIN. EUROPEAN MODELS!

---€

---£

*some assembly required

narag ◴[] No.15933391[source]
>>Hopefully, it's a bug, and that addon wasn't intended to be installed (much less active) universally like it is.

>hey look, a voice of reason!

Where's official statement saying it's a bug and it will be disabled ASAP? All I see is Mozilla workers here trying to justity the "bug".

replies(1): >>15933774 #
1. callahad ◴[] No.15933774[source]
I'm not happy with how this rolled out, and I'm not here to justify it.

I wasn't involved in its development, so I can't speak to its origin or the decision to use Shield for distribution, but I can gather feedback and answer technical questions about Firefox and the add-on.