←back to thread

383 points imartin2k | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
fiatjaf ◴[] No.14330452[source]
I don't understand what is wrong with Uber Eats charging whatever price they want to charge. If $4.4 is too low just don't work for them. There are probably people for which this is a good price. If not, it's Uber Eats problem, not yours.
replies(9): >>14330479 #>>14330508 #>>14330552 #>>14330563 #>>14330623 #>>14330949 #>>14331012 #>>14331032 #>>14331385 #
moxious ◴[] No.14330479[source]
It's not black and white. What looks to you like the free choice of people choosing to work for $4.4 may look to others like a forced situation. What I think you're missing is that your assumption that everyone can freely choose and has alternatives is clearly mistaken.
replies(1): >>14330502 #
reustle ◴[] No.14330502[source]
> may look to others like a forced situation. What I think you're missing is that your assumption that everyone can freely choose and has alternatives is clearly mistaken.

Could you please elaborate? I don't exactly follow. Nobody is forcing them to work for Uber. If what you mean is they have bills to pay, etc, it's not like Uber can just magically decide to pay $9/hr, they will likely need to cut most of the jobs at that point anyway.

replies(3): >>14330553 #>>14330618 #>>14330645 #
waisbrot ◴[] No.14330645[source]
Simplistically: people can either work or not work. Nearly everyone will chose "work" because it's nice to feel useful, even if that work doesn't pay a living wage.

If people are not earning a living wage, societies can either let them die in the street or subsidize them. Most societies will choose the later, because they're made of humans and not monsters.

That means that there really is a minimum wage, but it's paid in part or in full by the society. Companies that pay less than a living wage exploit the "humans don't like watching children starve to death" vulnerability and effectively steal from society. Additionally, paying a lower wage lets them offer a lower price to consumers which can drive out companies that were paying their customers an actual wage.

replies(2): >>14330836 #>>14331171 #
1. fiatjaf ◴[] No.14330836[source]
So you would rather have no UberEats than UberEats pahying $4.4?