←back to thread

668 points wildmusings | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
JorgeGT ◴[] No.13027099[source]
And without an "edited" mark, which means that any comment of any user can be covertly modified by an admin. Very concerning since Reddit comments have provoked even Congress hearings: http://thehill.com/policy/national-security/296680-house-pan...
replies(7): >>13027119 #>>13027125 #>>13027136 #>>13027240 #>>13027734 #>>13028391 #>>13033721 #
wvenable ◴[] No.13027119[source]
The fact is anything digital can be modified this way; it's probably good that it happens and there are public examples so people learn not to trust it.
replies(2): >>13027197 #>>13027891 #
ErikAugust ◴[] No.13027197[source]
Would be good to have some distributed model (like Bitcoin, etc.) for message platforms like Reddit?
replies(10): >>13027216 #>>13027239 #>>13027257 #>>13027396 #>>13027457 #>>13027930 #>>13028055 #>>13030203 #>>13030416 #>>13030833 #
qwertyuiop924 ◴[] No.13027257[source]
Yeah. That would be great. I'd go so far as to say that it would be a really Useful network. If you catch my drift.
replies(5): >>13027287 #>>13027292 #>>13027317 #>>13027363 #>>13027551 #
rjbwork ◴[] No.13027287[source]
Please, tell me more about this wonderful futuristic technology.
replies(2): >>13027337 #>>13027827 #
qwertyuiop924 ◴[] No.13027337[source]
Well, you see, there used to be a network coexistant with the internet, backed by UUCP, because Unix didn't have internet support yet (among other reasons).

And then there were these guys called Tom and Steve. And they wrote Usenet. And all was well until September fell. And then the usenet gradually faded into obscurity, as users moved towards walled gardens, and away from netnews. Some of these users were weeaboos: This is how the -chans made their way here from Japan.

replies(2): >>13027394 #>>13029692 #
1. ChuckMcM ◴[] No.13027394{3}[source]
Awesome! that totally reads like a future history of post apocalyptic script kiddy explaining the current state of the world.

Usenet was created because "networks" were expensive and "fax lines" were cheap. If you did it correctly machine A could call machine B in its local calling zone which could call machine C in its local calling zone and a message could go from A!B!C!user without incurring any long distance charges (aka "free").

Because you would lose your news feed if you pissed people off, spam was low because no admin would tolerate one of their users putting their system at risk of disconnection.

When networks because "free" and anyone could talk to anyone, there was no impediment to spam and no way to scale, and much of the infrastructure collapsed on itself.

That said, there is absolutely nothing preventing anyone from creating their own peer to peer messaging network. They could re-use the netnews code or write their own with a bit more security built in. The argument to that is "but hey no one will use it." to which you say "Who cares? My friends and I will use it." and since it is free and it is just you and your friends it will be fun and enjoyable. And if you're very unlucky everyone will join you.

replies(2): >>13027448 #>>13027781 #
2. qwertyuiop924 ◴[] No.13027448[source]
It reads like that in part because I was aiming for that vibe (something along the lines of http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/~ravenben/humor/historyofnet, or https://www.astro.umd.edu/~avondale/extra/Humor/ComputerHumo...). But also because my knowledge of Usenet history is very limited. So thanks for the crash course.
3. StavrosK ◴[] No.13027781[source]
> And if you're very unlucky everyone will join you.

That last line was very poignant.

replies(1): >>13029418 #
4. qwertyuiop924 ◴[] No.13029418[source]
But true.

I sure as heck hope that everyone doesn't join me in my communities: the magic would go away.