←back to thread

249 points andreyf | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
mrcharles ◴[] No.1282918[source]
Just another nail in the coffin of the usefulness of AV systems. And good riddance.

My work computer actually has McAfee on it, which I've disabled through the registry. Don't like how slow it makes my computer.

Education, people! It's better than buying useless feel-good software.

replies(4): >>1283010 #>>1283021 #>>1283112 #>>1284725 #
billybob ◴[] No.1283112[source]
I think it's interesting to consider computer viruses and biological pathogens in terms of "optimum harmfulness."

A cold virus's best strategy, for example, is to keep you awake coughing so your immune system is weak, make you sneeze and cough and have a runny nose so you spread germs, etc. But it shouldn't kill you, especially not before you pass it on. I've heard (did I read it in Guns, Germs and Steel?) that syphillis used to be more deadly, but that it got milder as an adaptive strategy.

Likewise, computer viruses probably have a pain threshold they shouldn't pass. If they can do their masters' bidding without hacking you off so bad that you format the computer, they'll be more successful.

Possibly unwarranted conclusion: computer viruses are now widespread precisely because they're Not That Bad.

So, are they worse than antivirus software? A lot of non-geeks may be asking themselves that question today. "Dang, we got a virus one time, but it didn't keep the computer from BOOTing!"

McAfee has just demonstrated a computer autoimmune disease.

replies(4): >>1283120 #>>1283146 #>>1283484 #>>1283724 #
1. wglb ◴[] No.1283484[source]
To computer viruses and biological pathogens, add virus scanners--that model holds. For example, if this incident causes sufficient negative publicity for McAfee, then perhaps it could disappear.

Does anyone recall the Michelangelo virus? One of the virus detection programs special release for that wiped the boot sector of every drive it was installed on. I think it is fair to say that in that case, the anti caused more monetary loss that the virus.