←back to thread

1106 points sama | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.211s | source
Show context
iMuzz ◴[] No.12508474[source]
Question/Answer I found interesting:

Sama> How should someone figure out how they should be useful?

Elon> Whatever this thing is you are trying to create.. What would be the utility delta compared to the current state of the art times how many people it would affect?

replies(8): >>12508769 #>>12509450 #>>12509709 #>>12509727 #>>12510398 #>>12513808 #>>12519665 #>>12519971 #
piedradura ◴[] No.12509727[source]
I would add another multiplicative factor: the probability that you have success in what you are trying to achieve, if that probability is near zero you effort will be in vain.
replies(3): >>12510229 #>>12510282 #>>12510872 #
metaphorm ◴[] No.12510282[source]
you should read some Taleb on this subject. ignoring low probability outcomes is not a good risk/success model.
replies(1): >>12512001 #
thr0waway1239 ◴[] No.12512001[source]
I ask as someone who is vaguely familiar with Taleb's ideas but didn't read the book:

That is a really fascinating point, especially considering this is literally a case where you are "betting your (future) life" on the low probability outcome event.

I mean, what is your hedge in that case? Does Taleb talk about that too?

replies(4): >>12512834 #>>12513374 #>>12517750 #>>12530337 #
1. spaceknarf ◴[] No.12530337[source]
Taleb investment advice: put almost all of your savings in super stable investments, like treasuries. Use the rest to bet on unicorn startups, or highly leveraged options (as long as those options have a limited downside and an unlimited upside!). I'm not quite sure how to apply this to one's career.