←back to thread

Microsoft and Canonical partner to bring Ubuntu to Windows 10

(www.zdnet.com)
535 points raddad | 4 comments | 30 Mar 16 11:12 UTC | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pvdebbe ◴[30 Mar 16 12:07 UTC] No.11388636[source]▶
This has a faint scent of an early April fool joke.
replies(1): >>11388969 #
tempodox ◴[30 Mar 16 13:13 UTC] No.11388969[source]▶
It does, but then find me a Linux user who doesn't dual-boot into Windoze for desktop apps. This way, you save one reboot. I wonder, however, how stable this will be...
replies(10): >>11388992 #>>11389097 #>>11389189 #>>11389282 #>>11389313 #>>11389508 #>>11389581 #>>11390681 #>>11390925 #>>11390993 #
bsharitt ◴[30 Mar 16 13:17 UTC] No.11388992[source]▶
I can't think I a single thing I'd need to boot into Windows for anymore.
replies(3): >>11389098 #>>11389099 #>>11389228 #
typon ◴[30 Mar 16 13:50 UTC] No.11389228[source]▶
Visual Studio is better than any IDE in existence. With ViEmu it becomes even better.
replies(1): >>11389332 #
tombert ◴[30 Mar 16 14:05 UTC] No.11389332[source]▶
Unless you don't have 30 spare gigs of storage space...
replies(1): >>11389575 #
1. typon ◴[30 Mar 16 14:39 UTC] No.11389575[source]▶
If by 30 you mean 20 gigs then, yes. Also, 20 gigs on a very decent 256GB SSD costs around $6.40. I don't know how much your hourly wage is, but the time Visual Studio saves me compared to other development platforms makes up for that money pretty quickly.
replies(2): >>11389675 #>>11389921 #
2. tombert ◴[30 Mar 16 14:52 UTC] No.11389675[source]▶
I was just being cheeky, honestly, but that price doesn't scale linearly, at least not on a laptop. A 512gb SSD might have a higher cost-per-GB than a 256GB SSD.

I don't run Windows and consequently haven't used VS in any kind of intimate detail, I'm sure it's great if you like dealing with IDEs. I feel more productive with Vim, tmux, GHCI, and GraspJS for doing of my web development.

3. rplnt ◴[30 Mar 16 15:20 UTC] No.11389921[source]▶
> If by 30 you mean 20 gigs then, yes.

I'm pretty sure VS doesn't require nowhere near that amount and you are talking about Windows symbols.

replies(1): >>11390086 #
4. tombert ◴[30 Mar 16 15:40 UTC] No.11390086[source]▶
That might be true; I had a slightly tainted image of VS when I had to use it three years ago, and after everything I needed was installed, I only had like a gig left (this was on a weak, underpowered netbook, admittedly).

In retrospect it's not entirely VS's fault, though I just found it amusing how quickly it ate through my storage when Vim only takes like 90 megs.