←back to thread

131 points apta | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.434s | source
Show context
PopsiclePete ◴[] No.9266559[source]
Ahhhh, he's a D programmer. That explains most of it. D programmers are only slightly behind C++ programmers in their universal hatred for Go. Rubyists can learn to love Go, Pythonistas can learn to love Go, NodeJs people even, but D programmers, man, it's like just the mere existence of Go is an assault on their very souls.

If D and C++ programmers hate Go, it's doing something right.

replies(4): >>9266701 #>>9266706 #>>9268171 #>>9269011 #
1. Grue3 ◴[] No.9269011[source]
No, it just means there is nothing in Go that would cause a D or C++ programmer to switch to it. The feature set of D and C++ is a superset of Go feature set.

This "they laughed at Einstein, so I must be right too" mentality is pure fanboyism.

replies(1): >>9290014 #
2. dvirsky ◴[] No.9290014[source]
As a (mostly ex) C++ oriented engineer, there is a hell of a lot that would make me prefer Go to C++ for a lot of tasks. A language is not about its features, it's about how it facilitates what you need to get done.