←back to thread

801 points tnorthcutt | 3 comments | | HN request time: 0.444s | source
Show context
mcherm ◴[] No.7524928[source]
Instead of a critique of how Tarsnap is run, this sounds like a business proposal for a company that would offer B2B services using Tarsnap as a back-end.

They could do things like offering a flat $100 rate for what is probably $2.60 of services and then roll around in the money. Or donate some of it to Tarsnap so it will keep running.

Hmm... in many ways, it's actually not a bad idea. Especially if you partnered with Tarsnap so you could effectively do referrals to each other: send the geeks to bare-bones Tarsnap and they'd send the PHBs to you.

replies(3): >>7524954 #>>7525127 #>>7525191 #
1. arohner ◴[] No.7524954[source]
Yes. I'd pay money for an OSX UI to backup my laptop.
replies(2): >>7527306 #>>7527316 #
2. dewey ◴[] No.7527306[source]
Why not just use Arq + S3/Glacier then? http://www.haystacksoftware.com/arq/
3. jamie_ca ◴[] No.7527316[source]
OSX UI to backup your laptop, encrypted, to AWS: www.haystacksoftware.com/arq/

I don't know tarsnap well enough to compare encryption models with Arq or anything, but I'm not invested enough to dig into it either. Arq works for me as a customer, and I'm not really in the tarsnap market.