←back to thread

581 points antr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
spankalee ◴[] No.6224168[source]
As a Googler, I can confirm that this article is... completely wrong.

I don't have to get approval to take 20% time, and I work with a number of people on their 20% projects.

I can also confirm that many people don't take their 20% time. Whether it's culture change due to new hiring, lack of imagination, pressure to excel on their primary project, I'm not sure, but it is disappointing. Still, in engineering No permission is needed.

replies(3): >>6224347 #>>6224491 #>>6224563 #
enraged_camel ◴[] No.6224563[source]
Michael Church (an outspoken ex-Googler) would disagree with you. One thing I remember him saying that was verified by several other Googlers, both current and ex, is that whether you are allowed 20% time depends on your team and your manager. And in fact, most teams in Google do not get 20% time, so you may be one of the lucky ones.
replies(3): >>6224917 #>>6226601 #>>6226959 #
spankalee ◴[] No.6224917[source]
Michael Church is someone who is not worth listening to. He made massively incorrect assertions while at Google, and continues to after he basically talked himself out of his job in a very public way.

Engineers get 20% time period. You can be asked to defer it for a quarter. On the other hand, most don't take it.

replies(2): >>6225323 #>>6227414 #
enraged_camel ◴[] No.6225323{3}[source]
Just because he made some massively incorrect assertions while at Google does not mean he is not worth listening to. Everyone says incorrect things sometimes. I mean, can you claim that you are right all the time? Probably not.

I don't know him personally but I read the stuff he writes, and while his character can be a bit abrasive he's an extremely intelligent dude who can make astute observations and connections that other people miss. I think you're doing him a lot of disservice by dismissing him the way you did.

replies(1): >>6225747 #
moultano ◴[] No.6225747{4}[source]
He was at Google for 6 months. Whatever you think about his opinions in general, he doesn't know anything about how things at Google work.
replies(2): >>6225940 #>>6225964 #
1. enraged_camel ◴[] No.6225940{5}[source]
How long do you have to be at a company to understand how things work in it?

(That's a trick question, since the answer is going to depend on the person's intelligence and ability to make observations.)

Also, a ton of long-time Googlers agree with the stuff he says. It's not like he's some lone dissenting voice.

replies(1): >>6226433 #