←back to thread

581 points antr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.216s | source
Show context
JamesCRR ◴[] No.6223660[source]
"if 20% time has been abandoned at Google, are other companies, which reportedly include Apple, LinkedIn, 3M and a host of others, wise to continue trying to copy it?"

That's incorrect, AFAIK 3M were the first company to pioneer this approach (with 15% of time spent on self-directed projects).

For example see: http://www.fastcodesign.com/1663137/how-3m-gave-everyone-day...

Talking to a friend at 3M (who has been there 20+ years, an engineer with dozens of patents) I am told that while 15% officially still exists, for a long time it's effectively meant working 115% of hours.

Nonetheless the tradition allowing self-directed research continues at 3M - and this might mean using lab resources, or creating prototypes without getting approval.

replies(4): >>6223680 #>>6223830 #>>6223991 #>>6224169 #
aylons ◴[] No.6223680[source]
> Nonetheless the tradition allowing self-directed research continues at 3M - and this might mean using lab resources, or creating prototypes without getting approval.

And get hours paid for it, even it being extra hours you wouldn't do other way.

replies(1): >>6223920 #
rgbrenner ◴[] No.6223920[source]
"And get hours paid for it,"

I don't work there, but I feel pretty safe in saying 3M researchers are not hourly employees.

replies(1): >>6224924 #
1. atwebb ◴[] No.6224924[source]
But it could correspond to other benefits such as applying the time towards paid time off or something like that.