←back to thread

581 points antr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.214s | source
Show context
ferdo ◴[] No.6223638[source]
I'd point out that Page and Brin predicted the course of their own search engine, and perhaps their own company, in 1998:

“The goals of the advertising business model do not always correspond to providing quality search to users.”

“We expect that advertising funded search engines will be inherently biased towards the advertisers and away from the needs of the consumers.”

“Advertising income often provides an incentive to provide poor quality search results.”

"Since it is very difficult even for experts to evaluate search engines, search engine bias is particularly insidious. A good example was OpenText, which was reported to be selling companies the right to be listed at the top of the search results for particular queries. This type of bias is much more insidious than advertising, because it is not clear who “deserves” to be there, and who is willing to pay money to be listed.”

“We believe the issue of advertising causes enough mixed incentives that it is crucial to have a competitive search engine that is transparent and in the academic realm.”

“Search engines have migrated from the academic domain to the commercial. Up until now most search engine development has gone on at companies with little publication of technical details. This causes search engine technology to remain largely a black art and to be advertising oriented. With Google, we have a strong goal to push more development and understanding into the academic realm.”

> http://infolab.stanford.edu/~backrub/google.html

replies(4): >>6223717 #>>6224148 #>>6224377 #>>6224668 #
1. ttflee ◴[] No.6224668[source]
This is exactly what Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) has been doing in recent years. IMHO, the precision of results from Baidu is less competitive in many niche perspectives compared with that from Google, and many keywords draws hoax, sponsored links by liars/copycats/fake suppliers. The reason is obvious. Censorship in various ways blocks Google from entering Chinese market, and the rest of the players are just not strong enough to compete with Baidu. However, Baidu is good in providing the latest rumours and gossips on entertaining subjects/celebrities.

Also, Baidu was accused by many to have intentionally removed or weighed down the links to sites, admins of which have refused to bid advertisement or increase their advertisement bidding. I cannot explain such strategy except to hypothesize that Baidu has sustained de facto monopoly.