←back to thread

305 points evolve2k | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.423s | source
Show context
mtgx ◴[] No.5878801[source]
I can support this, but only if it offers real safety as opposed to Google.

So does it? Or is it safe only because NSA hasn't bothered to go to DDG yet, or do whatever they are doing to get Google's search data (cable splitters or whatever)?

replies(2): >>5878896 #>>5878939 #
rcthompson ◴[] No.5878939[source]
You should read their privacy policy: https://duckduckgo.com/privacy#s5
replies(1): >>5880561 #
1. wtvanhest ◴[] No.5880561[source]
"Also, like anyone else, we will comply with court ordered legal requests. However, in our case, we don't expect any because there is nothing useful to give them since we don't collect any personal information."

Yes, until the NSA requests that DDG allow them to see all searches in real time. You could argue that it says "court ordered" but no one here has any clue what type of pressure the government used to get PRISM through at a major publicly traded company or what they are capable of with a small operation like DDG.

[added] as pointed out below, the NSA could and will just save the searches which would result DDG being just as insecure as google.

replies(1): >>5880687 #
2. levesque ◴[] No.5880687[source]
Then the NSA only has to save these searches somewhere in place of DDG - we end up with the same result.