←back to thread

114 points muellerwolfram | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source

I hope it didn’t get asked before, I couldn’t find anything.

There was a question recently, about why you don’t improve the HTML of HN, where you said "When the HTML is the most important thing to work on."(http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4927231)

I agree that the markup is relatively unimportant compared to features that I think could really improve the functionality and quality of the site, and I bet you have a long wishlist of features yourself.

But between the lines I interpreted that that list might be way longer, than the time that is available to you, allows you to work on it.

So why don’t you open source HN? I get that with a project that is important to someone, it’s hard to give away control. But you can still be the project lead, you could still have the last call and I feel to open up the project will lead to great feature discussions and ultimately a better hn.

Have you ever considered open sourcing it? And what’s the thought process on your decision?

Show context
jff ◴[] No.5006342[source]
It's simple but effective. The pages load quickly and look pretty decent in many different browsers.

I'm really happy that HN isn't your typical constantly-mutating, constantly growing news site, adding a new social share button and 2KB of new Javascript every week. Please, pg, don't start taking pull requests or anything like that, it's great the way it is.

Edit: look at the current top story. A pretty but not especially functional Facebook redesign, proposed as the latest in a long line of changes that the users pretty much always disliked. There's my point.

replies(7): >>5006376 #>>5006377 #>>5006405 #>>5006514 #>>5006644 #>>5006645 #>>5006873 #
chj ◴[] No.5006514[source]
A big problem is: Comments are too deep for mobile devices.
replies(3): >>5006674 #>>5006753 #>>5006793 #
1. aw3c2 ◴[] No.5006793[source]
works well enough with opera mobile. it reflows them so they fit the screen.