Most active commenters

    ←back to thread

    Claude in Chrome

    (claude.com)
    280 points ianrahman | 18 comments | | HN request time: 1.208s | source | bottom
    Show context
    CAP_NET_ADMIN ◴[] No.46340821[source]
    Let's spend years plugging holes in V8, splitting browser components to separate processes and improving sandboxing and then just plug in LLM with debugging enabled into Chrome. Great idea. Last time we had such a great idea it was lead in gasoline.
    replies(6): >>46340861 #>>46340956 #>>46341146 #>>46341730 #>>46341782 #>>46344113 #
    1. sheepscreek ◴[] No.46341782[source]
    This made me want to laugh so hard. I think this idea came from the same place as beta testing “Full Autopilot” with human guinea pigs. Great minds…

    Jokes aside, Anthropic CEO commands a tad more respect from me, on taking a more principals approach and sticking to it (at least better than their biggest rival). Also for inventing the code agent in the terminal category.

    replies(5): >>46341921 #>>46342325 #>>46343274 #>>46345684 #>>46346098 #
    2. stingraycharles ◴[] No.46341921[source]
    All things considered Anthropic seems like they’re doing most things the right way, and seemed to be focused on professional use more than OpenAI and Grok, and Opus 4.5 is really an incredibly good model.

    Yes, they know how to use their safety research as marketing, and yes, they got a big DoD contract, but I don’t think that fundamentally conflicts with their core mission.

    And honestly, some of their research they publish is genuinely interesting.

    3. IAmGraydon ◴[] No.46342325[source]
    >Also for inventing the code agent in the terminal category.

    Not even close. That distinction belongs to Aider, which was released 1.5 years before Claude Code.

    replies(2): >>46342863 #>>46343410 #
    4. sheepscreek ◴[] No.46342863[source]
    Oh cool, I didn’t know that.
    5. mejutoco ◴[] No.46343274[source]
    > Also for inventing the code agent in the terminal category.

    Maybe I am wrong, but wasnt aider first?

    replies(2): >>46343367 #>>46343606 #
    6. afro88 ◴[] No.46343367[source]
    Aider wasn't really an agentic loop before Claude Code came along
    replies(1): >>46343434 #
    7. bpavuk ◴[] No.46343410[source]
    let me be a date-time nerd for a split second:

    - Claude Code released Introducing Claude Code video on 24 Feb 2025 [0]

    - Aider's oldest known GitHub release, v0.5.0, is dated 8 Jun 2025 [1]

    [0]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJpK3YTTKZ4

    [1]: https://github.com/Aider-AI/aider/releases/tag/v0.5.0

    replies(4): >>46343562 #>>46343639 #>>46344333 #>>46345493 #
    8. mejutoco ◴[] No.46343434{3}[source]
    I would love to know more. I used aider with local models and it behaved like cursor in agent mode. Unfortunately I dont remember exactly when (+6 months ago at least). What was your experience with it?
    replies(1): >>46346807 #
    9. jeeeb ◴[] No.46343562{3}[source]
    That’s 8th of June 2023 not 2025.. almost 2 years before Claude Code was released.

    I remember evaluating Aider and Cursor side by side before Claude Code existed.

    10. stingraycharles ◴[] No.46343606[source]
    They are not at all the same thing. For starters, even ‘till this day, it doesn’t support ReAct-based tool calling.

    It’s more like an assistant that advices you rather than a tool that you hand full control to.

    Not saying that either is better, but they’re not the same thing.

    replies(1): >>46345727 #
    11. ◴[] No.46343639{3}[source]
    12. social_quotient ◴[] No.46344333{3}[source]
    Hey your dates are wildly wrong... It’s important people know aider is 2023. 2 years before CC
    13. IAmGraydon ◴[] No.46345493{3}[source]
    Wrong. So wrong, in fact, that I’m wondering if it’s intentional. Aider was June 2023.
    replies(1): >>46347174 #
    14. CuriouslyC ◴[] No.46345684[source]
    Dario is definitely more grounded than Sam, I thought Anthropic would get crowded out between Google and the Chinese labs, but they might be able to carve out a decent niche as the business focused AI for people who are paranoid about China.

    They didn't invest terminal agents really though, Aider was the pioneer there, they just made it more autonomous (Aider could do multiple turns with some config but it was designed to have a short leash since models weren't so capable when it was released).

    15. CuriouslyC ◴[] No.46345727{3}[source]
    Aider was designed to do single turns becasue LLMs were way worse when it was created. That being said, Aider could do multiple turns of tool calling if command confirmation was turned off, and it was trivial to configure Aider to do multiple turns of code generation by having a test suite that runs automatically on changes and telling Aider to implement functionality to get the tests to pass. It's hard coded to only do 3 autonomous turns by default but you can edit that.
    16. Workaccount2 ◴[] No.46346098[source]
    Anthropic isn't any more moral or principled than the other labs, they just saw the writing on the wall that they can't win and instead decided to focus purely on coding and then selling their shortcomings as some kind of socially conscious effort.

    It's a bit like the poorest billionaire flexing how environmentally aware they are because they don't have a 300ft yacht.

    17. afro88 ◴[] No.46346807{4}[source]
    I was a heavy user, but stopped using it mid 2024. It was essentially providing codebase context and editing and writing code as you instructed - a decent step up from copy/paste to ChatGPT but not working in an agentic loop. There was logic to attempt code edits again if they failed to apply too.

    Edit: I stand corrected though. Did a bit of research and aider is considered an agentic tool by late 2023 with auto lint/test steps that feedback to the LLM. My apologies.

    18. bpavuk ◴[] No.46347174{4}[source]
    sorry, editing it out! thanks for pointing out.

    EDIT: I was too late to edit it. I have to keep an eye on what I type...