←back to thread

14 points johnwheeler | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source

On Hacker News and Twitter, the consensus view is that no one is afraid. People concede that junior engineers and grad students might be the most affected. But, they still seem to hold on to their situations as being sustainable. My question is, is this just a part of wishful thinking and human nature, trying to combat the inevitable? The reason I ask is because I seriously don't see a future where there's a bunch of programmers anymore. I see mass unemployment for programmers. People are in denial, and all of these claims that the AI can't write code without making mistakes are no longer valid once an AI is released potentially overnight, that writes flawless code. Claude 4.5 is a good example. I just really don't see any valid arguments that the technology is not going to get to a point where it makes the job irrelevant, not irrelevant, but completely changes the economics.
Show context
gitgud ◴[] No.46340210[source]
No, managers don’t want to be using Claude Code… tools change
replies(1): >>46340602 #
1. johnwheeler ◴[] No.46340602[source]
This is a really weak argument.
replies(1): >>46340790 #
2. gitgud ◴[] No.46340790[source]
I guess the main argument is that there will always be technical and non-technical people in companies. Some people don’t even like prompting to get an AI image, let alone prompting to fix/maintain software…