←back to thread

Samsung may end SATA SSD production soon

(www.techradar.com)
108 points Krontab | 1 comments | 15 Dec 25 14:51 UTC | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
tart-lemonade ◴[15 Dec 25 16:25 UTC] No.46276589[source]▶
I can't say I'm surprised, but I am disappointed. The SATA SSD market has basically turned into a dumping ground for low quality flash and controllers, with the 870s being the only consistently good drives still in production after Crucial discontinued the MX500.

It's the end of an era.

replies(1): >>46277031 #
crote ◴[15 Dec 25 16:57 UTC] No.46277031[source]▶
The thing is, what's the market for them?

If you care even remotely about speed, you'll get an NVMe drive. If you're a data hoarder who wants to connect 50 drives, you'll go for spinning rust. Enterprise will go for U.3.

So what's left? An upgrade for grandma's 15-year-old desktop? A borderline-scammy pre-built machine where the listed spec is "1TB SSD" and they used the absolute cheapest drive they can find? Maybe a boot drive for some VM host?

replies(4): >>46277074 #>>46277368 #>>46279093 #>>46280125 #
pjdesno ◴[15 Dec 25 19:22 UTC] No.46279093[source]▶
> Maybe a boot drive for some VM host?

Actually that's a really common use - I've bought a half dozen or so Dell rack mount servers in the last 5 years or so, and work with folks who buy orders of magnitude more, and we all spec RAID0 SATA boot drives. If SATA goes away, I think you'll find low-capacity SAS drives filling that niche.

I highly doubt you'll find M.2 drives filling that niche, either. 2.5" drives can be replaced without opening the machine, too, which is a major win - every time you pull the machine out on its rails and pop the top is another opportunity for cables to come out or other things to go wrong.

replies(2): >>46279743 #>>46280627 #
1. wtallis ◴[15 Dec 25 21:04 UTC] No.46280627{3}[source]▶
M.2 boot drives for servers have been popular for years. There's a whole product segment of server boot drives that are relatively low capacity, sometimes even using the consumer form factor (80mm long instead of 110mm) but still including power loss protection. Marvell even made a hardware RAID0/1 controller for NVMe specifically to handle this use case. Nobody's adding a SAS HBA to a server that didn't already need one, and nobody's making any cheap low-port-count SAS HBAs.