←back to thread

108 points Krontab | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
Neil44 ◴[] No.46276482[source]
Samsung makes fast expensive storage but even cheap storage can max out SATA, hence there's no point Samsung trying to compete in the dwindling SATA space.
replies(1): >>46277119 #
mwambua ◴[] No.46277119[source]
Does this mean that we'll start to see SATA replaced with faster interfaces in the future? Something like U.2/U.3 that's currently available to the enterprise?
replies(4): >>46277392 #>>46277882 #>>46278452 #>>46279721 #
zamadatix ◴[] No.46277882[source]
NVMe via m.2 remains more than fine for covering the consumer SSD use cases.
replies(1): >>46278011 #
zokier ◴[] No.46278011[source]
Problem is that you only get pitiful amount of m2 slots in mainstream motherboards.
replies(6): >>46278102 #>>46278125 #>>46278488 #>>46278499 #>>46280050 #>>46282571 #
1. zamadatix ◴[] No.46280050[source]
On top of what the others have said, any faster interface you replace SATA with will have the same problem set because it's rooted in the total bandwidth to the CPU, not the form factor of the slot.

E.g. going to the suggested U.2 is still going to net you looking for the PCIe lanes to be available for it.