←back to thread

108 points Krontab | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
Neil44 ◴[] No.46276482[source]
Samsung makes fast expensive storage but even cheap storage can max out SATA, hence there's no point Samsung trying to compete in the dwindling SATA space.
replies(1): >>46277119 #
mwambua ◴[] No.46277119[source]
Does this mean that we'll start to see SATA replaced with faster interfaces in the future? Something like U.2/U.3 that's currently available to the enterprise?
replies(4): >>46277392 #>>46277882 #>>46278452 #>>46279721 #
1. barrkel ◴[] No.46277392[source]
It's more likely that third party integrators will look after the demand for SSD SAS/SATA devices, and the demand won't go away because SAS multiplexers are cheap and NVMe/PCIe is point to point and expensive to make switching hardware for.

Likely we'd need a different protocol to make scaling up the number of high speed SSDs in a single box to work well.