←back to thread

59 points tobr | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.202s | source
Show context
grvbck ◴[] No.46272807[source]
> Gizmodo reached out to Grok-developer xAI for comment, but they have only responded with the usual automated reply, “Legacy Media Lies.”

European here, so perhaps not my place to have an opinion on domestic U.S. legal policies, and I don't want to make this political (although I guess it kind of is…) BUT:

Why are no media outlets on the offense when companies use these kinds of statements? Shouldn't Gizmodo, or its owner Keleops Media, treat this as slander and take it to court? If Grok's behavior can be objectively verified, why is it so easy for a company to get off the hook so easily just by saying "lies" and move on?

replies(9): >>46272934 #>>46272968 #>>46273373 #>>46273529 #>>46273914 #>>46273985 #>>46274393 #>>46274763 #>>46275547 #
notslander ◴[] No.46273373[source]
Another european here (very important fact)

Also not slander when its the pure truth verifiable with daily evidence

replies(2): >>46273871 #>>46273939 #
1. throwawayqqq11 ◴[] No.46273871[source]
When you have the pure truth, why would you silently dismiss questions about your truth bot and not blast it 24/7?

Because right wingers cant handle criticsm. They dont want to correct, they want to silence their outgroups. Professionals would have at least replied with some meaningless PR text wall.