←back to thread

179 points joelkesler | 2 comments | | HN request time: 0.001s | source
Show context
ares623 ◴[] No.46257756[source]
Are we stuck with the same toothbrush UX forever?
replies(5): >>46257831 #>>46258350 #>>46258847 #>>46258990 #>>46264349 #
1. TheAceOfHearts ◴[] No.46264349[source]
This is a bad example because it's solving a problem over a much more constrained domain.

A UX revolution in teeth-cleaning technology would probably look like some kind of bio-organism or colony that eats plaque and kills plaque-producing bacteria. In an ideal world you wouldn't have to brush your teeth at all, aside from an occasionally floss or scrub.

replies(1): >>46266624 #
2. ares623 ◴[] No.46266624[source]
Disagree. You're ignoring cost completely (end to end including R&D, manufacturing, logistics, testing, approvals)

I can have a personal dentist brush my teeth while I lie down.

There's a point where UX-that-works-at-acceptable-cost is good enough.

Maybe desktop UX is like the shark. An evolutionary dead-end, but it gets the job done extremely well. (Would be cool if they have lasers on their frickin' heads though)