←back to thread

209 points pseudolus | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0s | source
Show context
pj_mukh ◴[] No.46254203[source]
[flagged]
replies(6): >>46254386 #>>46254541 #>>46254808 #>>46254891 #>>46255504 #>>46256750 #
Pooge ◴[] No.46254386[source]
Their point is that despite being the designers of such systems, they prevent their own children from using them. Akin to a drug dealer not consuming what he sells.
replies(6): >>46254401 #>>46254409 #>>46254432 #>>46254446 #>>46254533 #>>46255312 #
hamburglar ◴[] No.46254432[source]
Breaking: Willy Wonka execs don’t let their kids eat unlimited amount of candy.

See how uninteresting and obvious that is?

replies(2): >>46255318 #>>46255387 #
tgv ◴[] No.46255318[source]
That misses the point by a mile and a half: nobody let's their children eat unlimited amounts of chocolate. They do, however, let their children access Tiltok, Youtube, etc.
replies(2): >>46255716 #>>46256636 #
1. iteria ◴[] No.46255716[source]
Except that's not true. Plenty of parents let their kids have unlimited access to junk food and candy. Neighbor kids come over and they don't know what to do because I only have water, fruit, and pretzels. I have been to so many parent's houses who have whole pantries of just sugary snacks.