←back to thread

209 points pseudolus | 4 comments | | HN request time: 0.48s | source
Show context
pj_mukh ◴[] No.46254203[source]
[flagged]
replies(6): >>46254386 #>>46254541 #>>46254808 #>>46254891 #>>46255504 #>>46256750 #
Pooge ◴[] No.46254386[source]
Their point is that despite being the designers of such systems, they prevent their own children from using them. Akin to a drug dealer not consuming what he sells.
replies(6): >>46254401 #>>46254409 #>>46254432 #>>46254446 #>>46254533 #>>46255312 #
1. lesuorac ◴[] No.46254409[source]
I would expect an x-ray technician to limit their kid's time in x-rays.

It doesn't mean kids should never get an x-ray.

Sometimes moderation means complete abstinence but generally not.

replies(2): >>46254429 #>>46254944 #
2. websiteapi ◴[] No.46254429[source]
You cannot be serious with this comparison.
3. exe34 ◴[] No.46254944[source]
could you highlight what in the original article made you think they were banning their kids from social media entirely? or were you trying to explain something else?
replies(1): >>46255890 #
4. tsimionescu ◴[] No.46255890[source]
The GGP, not the original article, said "they prevent [emp. mine] their kids from using them".