←back to thread

432 points nobody9999 | 1 comments | | HN request time: 0.203s | source
Show context
codedokode ◴[] No.46246465[source]
In my opinion, every manufacturer of a programmable device should not be allowed to prevent the buyer from reprogramming it.
replies(8): >>46247960 #>>46248388 #>>46250102 #>>46250233 #>>46251819 #>>46252140 #>>46252929 #>>46280460 #
tomp ◴[] No.46250233[source]
Well, your opinion is literally illegal.

You're legally (and technically) prohibited from re-programming GPS modules, GSM modules, and probably many stuff in cars as well.

(Actually, maybe contractually when it comes to GPS modules.)

replies(9): >>46250260 #>>46250373 #>>46250403 #>>46250597 #>>46251072 #>>46251189 #>>46251287 #>>46251450 #>>46253001 #
uselesswords ◴[] No.46251189[source]
Technical point here but opinions are not illegal to have.

Besides that your point is missing the fact that you are dealing with outside services that provide a contract for their usage (GPS, GSM). You should be free to program your own devices but if you use an external service, then yes they can specify how you use their service. Those are contractual obligations. Cars on the road have clear safety risks and those are legal obligations. None of those obligations should govern what you do with your device until your device interacts with other people and/or services.

replies(2): >>46251245 #>>46251887 #
tomp ◴[] No.46251245[source]
> if you use an external service, then yes they can specify how you use their service. Those are contractual obligations.

Sounds like something Apple would say.

replies(1): >>46253897 #
1. manjalyc ◴[] No.46253897[source]
The difference is apple doesn’t let you modify your device to use other services. Their contractual obligation goes beyond the service itself. That’s why EPIC won this case.