←back to thread

Epic celebrates "the end of the Apple Tax" after court win in iOS payments case

(arstechnica.com)
432 points nobody9999 | 1 comments | 12 Dec 25 16:04 UTC | HN request time: 0.201s | source
Show context
codedokode ◴[12 Dec 25 17:38 UTC] No.46246465[source]▶
In my opinion, every manufacturer of a programmable device should not be allowed to prevent the buyer from reprogramming it.
replies(8): >>46247960 #>>46248388 #>>46250102 #>>46250233 #>>46251819 #>>46252140 #>>46252929 #>>46280460 #
lostlogin ◴[13 Dec 25 05:01 UTC] No.46252140[source]▶
What about a pacemaker? Or a car?
replies(3): >>46252258 #>>46252398 #>>46252804 #
1. octoberfranklin ◴[13 Dec 25 05:27 UTC] No.46252258[source]▶
Cars were user-reprogrammable for a long time and the sky never fell.

Requiring that the pacemaker be outside a human body in order to reprogram it seems like a very sensible solution.